Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Markus Wanner
Subject Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker
Date
Msg-id 50B8BAE4.3030001@bluegap.ch
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker  (Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro,

On 11/30/2012 02:44 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> So it
> makes easier to have processes that need to run alongside postmaster.

That's where we are in respectful disagreement, then. As I don't think
that's easier, overall, but in my eye, this looks like a foot gun.

As long as things like pgbouncer, pgqd, etc.. keep to be available as
separate daemons, I'm happy, though.

Regards

Markus Wanner



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker
Next
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker