Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker
Date
Msg-id 20121130134443.GD4542@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker  (Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch>)
Responses Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker  (Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch>)
List pgsql-hackers
Markus Wanner wrote:
> On 11/30/2012 01:40 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> > I totally missed the need to connect to shared memory to be able to
> > connect to a database and query it. Can't we just link the bgworkder
> > code to the client libpq library, just as plproxy is doing I believe?
>
> Well, sure you can use libpq. But so can external processes. So that's
> no benefit of running under the postmaster.

No, it's not a benefit of that; but such a process would get started up
when postmaster is started, and shut down when postmaster stops.  So it
makes easier to have processes that need to run alongside postmaster.

--
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker
Next
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker