On 10/15/2012 4:06 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 11.10.2012 22:36, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Heikki Linnakangas<hlinnakangas@vmware.com> writes:
>>> Hmm, starting with 9.3, postmaster can not only create and append to
>>> the
>>> end of file, it can also inject a line in the middle, shifting the
>>> following lines forwards. In theory, if a new line is injected into the
>>> middle of the file between fgets() calls, readfile() could read part of
>>> the same line twice. Not sure what consequences that could have; pg_ctl
>>> might try to connect to wrong address or socket directory.
>>
>> Hm. IIRC, the postmaster is careful to write the whole thing in a
>> single write() call, which in principle is atomic. Perhaps you're
>> right that we'd better have pg_ctl read it in a single read() to
>> ensure that it sees a consistent file state. Otherwise we're making
>> assumptions about what sort of buffering underlies the stdio functions.
>
> Ok, changed it to slurp the whole file to memory with one read() call.
>
> Dave, did this silence the static analysis tool you used?
>
> - Heikki
Heikki,
It's happy about the overruns. It did flag an issue where the file
descriptor can leak when the various early returns get taken.
- Dave
