Re: 9.2 Cascading replication after slave promotion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: 9.2 Cascading replication after slave promotion
Date
Msg-id 502A8FCF.7010705@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.2 Cascading replication after slave promotion  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: 9.2 Cascading replication after slave promotion
List pgsql-hackers
> Yeah, I think there's more people that agree with this use-case than you
> seem to think..  That said, I appreciate that it's not a trivial thing
> to support cleanly.

Not trivial, no, but not major either.  Really what needs to happen is
for the timeline change record to get transmitted over the WAL stream.

Hmmm.  You know, I bet I could get stream-only remastering working in an
unsafe way just by disabling the timeline checks.  Time to test ...

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP patch for consolidating misplaced-aggregate checks
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: default_isolation_level='serializable' crashes on Windows