Re: 9.2 Cascading replication after slave promotion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: 9.2 Cascading replication after slave promotion
Date
Msg-id 20120814022447.GT1267@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.2 Cascading replication after slave promotion  (Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: 9.2 Cascading replication after slave promotion
List pgsql-hackers
* Daniel Farina (daniel@heroku.com) wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> > To date, I seem to be the only one convinced that this is an actual
> > deficiency ...
>
> It is an actual deficiency, and I am convinced.

Yeah, I think there's more people that agree with this use-case than you
seem to think..  That said, I appreciate that it's not a trivial thing
to support cleanly.
Thanks,
    Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: SIGFPE handler is naive
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: SIGFPE handler is naive