At 10:38 AM 12/07/2003 -0700, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> deferred after trigger row 1
> deferred after trigger #2 row a
> deferred after trigger row 2
> deferred after trigger #2 row b
I'd vote for this; ie. make them execute in the same order they would
execute if they were not deferred. Otherwise you open up all sorts of weird
application errors if a trigger is deferred/not-deferred.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 03 5330 3172 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \| | --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
