Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Philip Warner
Subject Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Date
Msg-id 5.1.0.14.0.20021002093409.04457f78@mail.rhyme.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
List pgsql-hackers
At 09:59 AM 1/10/2002 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>If there is a problem, seems like we'd better fix it.  Perhaps there
>needs to be something in the header to tell the reader the sizeof
>off_t.

Yes, and do the peripheral stuff to support old archives etc. We also need 
to be careful about the places where we do file-position-arithmetic - if 
there are any, I can't recall.

I am not sure we need to worry about whether zlib supports large files 
since I am pretty sure we don't use zlib for file IO - we just pass it 
in-memory blocks; so it should work no matter how much data is in the stream.


----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498)          |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82         |                 ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|                                 |    --________--
PGP key available upon request,  |  /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371   |/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.2.3 patching done
Next
From: Philip Warner
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?