Re: Index plan returns different results to sequential scan - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

On 3/22/24 08:43, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 3/22/24 02:40, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 9:22 PM Tomas Vondra
>> <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>> I don't know what the problem is, or whether it's a big in PG or in the
>>> postcode extension (I agree the extension is fairly straightforward).
>>
>> Could you try running amcheck's bt_index_check function against the index?
>>
> 
> I tried (on master). It doesn't report anything:
> 
> test=# select bt_index_check('xxx_postcode_idx', 't');
>  bt_index_check
> ----------------
> 
> (1 row)
> 
> I also tried looking at the index using bt_page_items from pageinspect,
> and I did not notice anything obviously wrong. But I don't have much
> experience with btree at such low level ...
> 

I realized I can create an index on e5adcb789, apply dd299df81 and
create another index, and then compare what bt_page_items says for those.

FWIW xxx_postcode_idx (created before e5adcb789) keeps returning the
correct data even after dd299df81 gets applied.

I'll only show 5 rows - the only difference is in the first item (which
I guess is hikey?), all other items are exactly the same.

For the index created on e5adcb789 (that returns the correct results
even with the new build), I get this:



test=# select * from bt_page_items(get_Raw_page('xxx_postcode_idx', 1))
limit 5;
 itemoffset |  ctid  | itemlen | nulls | vars |          data
------------+--------+---------+-------+------+-------------------------
          1 | (2,15) |      16 | f     | f    | ce 51 20 50 00 00 00 00
          2 | (0,1)  |      16 | f     | f    | 27 48 20 01 00 00 00 00
          3 | (0,2)  |      16 | f     | f    | 30 48 20 01 00 00 00 00
          4 | (0,3)  |      16 | f     | f    | 41 48 20 01 00 00 00 00
          5 | (0,4)  |      16 | f     | f    | 41 48 20 01 00 00 00 00
(5 rows)

test=# select * from bt_page_items(get_Raw_page('xxx_postcode_idx', 2))
limit 5;
 itemoffset |  ctid  | itemlen | nulls | vars |          data
------------+--------+---------+-------+------+-------------------------
          1 | (4,5)  |      16 | f     | f    | 25 60 20 50 00 00 00 00
          2 | (2,15) |      16 | f     | f    | ce 51 20 50 00 00 00 00
          3 | (2,16) |      16 | f     | f    | d3 51 20 50 00 00 00 00
          4 | (2,17) |      16 | f     | f    | d3 51 20 50 00 00 00 00
          5 | (2,18) |      16 | f     | f    | d3 51 20 50 00 00 00 00
(5 rows)

test=# select * from bt_page_items(get_Raw_page('xxx_postcode_idx', 3))
limit 5;
 itemoffset |  ctid  | itemlen | nulls | vars |          data
------------+--------+---------+-------+------+-------------------------
          1 | (1,0)  |       8 | f     | f    |
          2 | (2,15) |      16 | f     | f    | ce 51 20 50 00 00 00 00
          3 | (4,5)  |      16 | f     | f    | 25 60 20 50 00 00 00 00
(3 rows)

test=# select * from bt_page_items(get_Raw_page('xxx_postcode_idx', 4))
limit 5;
 itemoffset | ctid  | itemlen | nulls | vars |          data
------------+-------+---------+-------+------+-------------------------
          1 | (4,5) |      16 | f     | f    | 25 60 20 50 00 00 00 00
          2 | (4,6) |      16 | f     | f    | 25 60 20 50 00 00 00 00
          3 | (4,7) |      16 | f     | f    | 25 60 20 50 00 00 00 00
          4 | (4,8) |      16 | f     | f    | 25 60 20 50 00 00 00 00
          5 | (4,9) |      16 | f     | f    | 30 60 20 50 00 00 00 00
(5 rows)



while for the index created with dd299df81 (and returning incomplete
results) I get this:



test=# select * from bt_page_items(get_Raw_page('xxx2_postcode_idx', 1))
limit 5;
 itemoffset | ctid  | itemlen | nulls | vars |          data
------------+-------+---------+-------+------+-------------------------
          1 | (2,1) |      16 | f     | f    | ce 51 20 50 00 00 00 00
          2 | (0,1) |      16 | f     | f    | 27 48 20 01 00 00 00 00
          3 | (0,2) |      16 | f     | f    | 30 48 20 01 00 00 00 00
          4 | (0,3) |      16 | f     | f    | 41 48 20 01 00 00 00 00
          5 | (0,4) |      16 | f     | f    | 41 48 20 01 00 00 00 00
(5 rows)

test=# select * from bt_page_items(get_Raw_page('xxx2_postcode_idx', 2))
limit 5;
 itemoffset |   ctid   | itemlen | nulls | vars |
data
------------+----------+---------+-------+------+-------------------------------------------------
          1 | (4,4097) |      24 | f     | f    | 25 60 20 50 00 00 00
00 00 00 00 00 04 00 04 00
          2 | (2,15)   |      16 | f     | f    | ce 51 20 50 00 00 00 00
          3 | (2,16)   |      16 | f     | f    | d3 51 20 50 00 00 00 00
          4 | (2,17)   |      16 | f     | f    | d3 51 20 50 00 00 00 00
          5 | (2,18)   |      16 | f     | f    | d3 51 20 50 00 00 00 00
(5 rows)

test=# select * from bt_page_items(get_Raw_page('xxx2_postcode_idx', 3))
limit 5;
 itemoffset |   ctid   | itemlen | nulls | vars |
data
------------+----------+---------+-------+------+-------------------------------------------------
          1 | (1,0)    |       8 | f     | f    |
          2 | (2,1)    |      16 | f     | f    | ce 51 20 50 00 00 00 00
          3 | (4,4097) |      24 | f     | f    | 25 60 20 50 00 00 00
00 00 00 00 00 04 00 04 00
(3 rows)

test=# select * from bt_page_items(get_Raw_page('xxx2_postcode_idx', 4))
limit 5;
 itemoffset | ctid  | itemlen | nulls | vars |          data
------------+-------+---------+-------+------+-------------------------
          1 | (4,5) |      16 | f     | f    | 25 60 20 50 00 00 00 00
          2 | (4,6) |      16 | f     | f    | 25 60 20 50 00 00 00 00
          3 | (4,7) |      16 | f     | f    | 25 60 20 50 00 00 00 00
          4 | (4,8) |      16 | f     | f    | 25 60 20 50 00 00 00 00
          5 | (4,9) |      16 | f     | f    | 30 60 20 50 00 00 00 00
(5 rows)



regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company