Re: Backport of fsync queue compaction - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: Backport of fsync queue compaction
Date
Msg-id 4FE14C38.6030704@2ndQuadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Backport of fsync queue compaction  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 06/19/2012 08:41 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Josh Berkus<josh@agliodbs.com>  wrote:
>> To what version will we backport it?
>
> All supported branches, I would think.

Yeah, I would feel a lot better if this was improved in 8.3 and up.  I 
didn't bother trying to push it before now because I wanted both more 
bad examples and some miles on 9.1 without the new code triggering any 
problems from the field.  Seems we're at that point now.

I fear a lot of people are going to stay on 8.3 for a long time even 
after it's officially unsupported.  It's been hard enough to move some 
people off of 8.1 and 8.2 even with the carrot of "8.3 will be much 
faster at everything".  I fear 8.3 is going to end up like 7.4, where a 
7 year long support window passes and people are still using it years later.

-- 
Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    greg@2ndQuadrant.com   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow WAL information to recover corrupted pg_controldata
Next
From: Josh Kupershmidt
Date:
Subject: Re: return values of backend sub-main functions