Robert Haas wrote:
> I think that technically this patch can be polished well enough to
> commit in the time we have available, but the question of whether
> it's the right design is harder, and I don't want that to be my
> call alone.
I gather from previous posts that the intent isn't to allow different
packages from different authors to provide a common and compatible
feature; but what happens in the current design if someone
accidentally or maliciously produces an extension which provides the
same feature name as another extension?
Would we need some registry?
-Kevin
