On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:
> I gather from previous posts that the intent isn't to allow different
> packages from different authors to provide a common and compatible
> feature; but what happens in the current design if someone
> accidentally or maliciously produces an extension which provides the
> same feature name as another extension?
>
> Would we need some registry?
A good (documented) convention should make that unnecessary such
as:
packagename.feature
for example
provides hstore.populate_record
Or something along those lines. Or maybe even prefix it with java
like inverse url of author of package.
Cheers,
Bene
