Re: patch for parallel pg_dump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Subject | Re: patch for parallel pg_dump |
Date | |
Msg-id | 4F738071.4030301@dunslane.net Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: patch for parallel pg_dump (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Responses |
Re: patch for parallel pg_dump
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/28/2012 03:17 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > On 03/28/2012 02:27 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Alvaro Herrera >> <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: >>> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié mar 28 14:46:30 -0300 2012: >>>> I keep hoping someone who knows Windows is going to take a look at >>>> this, but so far no luck. It could also really use some attention >>>> from someone who has an actual really big database handy, to see how >>>> successful it is in reducing the dump time. Without those things, I >>>> can't see this getting committed. But in the meantime, a few fairly >>>> minor comments based on reading the code. >>> My main comment about the current patch is that it looks like it's >>> touching pg_restore parallel code by moving some stuff into parallel.c. >>> If that's really the case and its voluminous, maybe this patch would >>> shrink a bit if we could do the code moving in a first patch. That >>> would be mostly mechanical. Then the interesting stuff would apply on >>> top of that. That would make review easier. >> +1. > > +1 also. > > FYI I am just starting some test runs on Windows. I also have a > reasonably sized db (98 gb) on my SL6 server which should be perfect > for testing this (I just partitioned its two main tables), and will > try to get some timing runs. First hurdle: It doesn't build under Windows/mingw-w64: x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wformat-security -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -fexcess-precision=standard -g -I../../../src/interfaces/libpq-I../../../src/include -I./src/include/port/win32 -DEXEC_BACKEND -I/c/prog/mingwdep/include"-I../../../src/include/port/win32" -c -o parallel.o parallel.c parallel.c:40:12: error: staticdeclaration of 'pgpipe' follows non-static declaration ../../../src/include/port.h:268:12: note: previous declarationof 'pgpipe' was here parallel.c:41:12: error: static declaration of 'piperead' follows non-static declaration ../../../src/include/port.h:269:12: note: previous declaration of 'piperead' was here parallel.c: In function'ParallelBackupStart': parallel.c:455:9: warning: passing argument 3 of '_beginthreadex' from incompatible pointertype c:\mingw64\bin\../lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/4.5.3/../../../../x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/process.h:31:29: note: expected'unsigned int (*)(void *)' but argument is of type 'unsigned int (*)(struct WorkerInfo *)' make[3]: *** [parallel.o]Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/andrew/bf/root/HEAD/pgsql/src/bin/pg_dump' make[2]: *** [all-pg_dump-recurse]Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/andrew/bf/root/HEAD/pgsql/src/bin' make[1]: *** [all-bin-recurse]Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/andrew/bf/root/HEAD/pgsql/src' make: *** [all-src-recurse]Error 2 I'll have a look at that in a little while. cheers andrew > > cheers > > andrew > >
pgsql-hackers by date: