Re: patch for parallel pg_dump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: patch for parallel pg_dump
Date
Msg-id 4F738071.4030301@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: patch for parallel pg_dump  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: patch for parallel pg_dump
List pgsql-hackers

On 03/28/2012 03:17 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 03/28/2012 02:27 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre@commandprompt.com>  wrote:
>>> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié mar 28 14:46:30 -0300 2012:
>>>> I keep hoping someone who knows Windows is going to take a look at
>>>> this, but so far no luck.  It could also really use some attention
>>>> from someone who has an actual really big database handy, to see how
>>>> successful it is in reducing the dump time.  Without those things, I
>>>> can't see this getting committed.  But in the meantime, a few fairly
>>>> minor comments based on reading the code.
>>> My main comment about the current patch is that it looks like it's
>>> touching pg_restore parallel code by moving some stuff into parallel.c.
>>> If that's really the case and its voluminous, maybe this patch would
>>> shrink a bit if we could do the code moving in a first patch.  That
>>> would be mostly mechanical.  Then the interesting stuff would apply on
>>> top of that.  That would make review easier.
>> +1.
>
> +1 also.
>
> FYI I am just starting some test runs on Windows. I also have a
> reasonably sized db (98 gb) on my SL6 server which should be perfect
> for testing this (I just partitioned its two main tables), and will
> try to get some timing runs.


First hurdle: It doesn't build under Windows/mingw-w64:
   x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes   -Wpointer-arith -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels
 -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wformat-security -fno-strict-aliasing   -fwrapv -fexcess-precision=standard -g
-I../../../src/interfaces/libpq-I../../../src/include   -I./src/include/port/win32 -DEXEC_BACKEND
-I/c/prog/mingwdep/include"-I../../../src/include/port/win32"  -c   -o parallel.o parallel.c   parallel.c:40:12: error:
staticdeclaration of 'pgpipe' follows   non-static declaration   ../../../src/include/port.h:268:12: note: previous
declarationof   'pgpipe' was here   parallel.c:41:12: error: static declaration of 'piperead' follows   non-static
declaration  ../../../src/include/port.h:269:12: note: previous declaration of   'piperead' was here   parallel.c: In
function'ParallelBackupStart':   parallel.c:455:9: warning: passing argument 3 of '_beginthreadex'   from incompatible
pointertype
c:\mingw64\bin\../lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/4.5.3/../../../../x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/process.h:31:29:  note:
expected'unsigned int (*)(void *)' but argument is of type   'unsigned int (*)(struct WorkerInfo *)'   make[3]: ***
[parallel.o]Error 1   make[3]: Leaving directory   `/home/andrew/bf/root/HEAD/pgsql/src/bin/pg_dump'   make[2]: ***
[all-pg_dump-recurse]Error 2   make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/andrew/bf/root/HEAD/pgsql/src/bin'   make[1]: ***
[all-bin-recurse]Error 2   make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/andrew/bf/root/HEAD/pgsql/src'   make: ***
[all-src-recurse]Error 2 

I'll have a look at that in a little while.

cheers

andrew


>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER?
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Standbys, txid_current_snapshot, wraparound