Re: JSON for PG 9.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: JSON for PG 9.2
Date
Msg-id 4EEE2114.7000701@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: JSON for PG 9.2  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: JSON for PG 9.2  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 12/18/2011 12:17 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> One small note about the json type being an extension -- this probably
> means the json type oid won't be fixed -- not a huge deal but it could
> affect some corner cases with binary format consumers.
>
>


Why would that matter more for JSON than for any other non-core type?

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: JSON for PG 9.2
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: JSON for PG 9.2