Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Date
Msg-id 4EE30F14.2070507@2ndQuadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server  (Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 12/07/2011 02:34 AM, Shigeru Hanada wrote:
> I think that only the owner of foreign table can keep collation
> consistent between foreign and local, like data type of column.  We need to
> support per-column-collation on foreign tables too, or should deny pushing
> down condition which is collation-sensitive...
>    

I am not sure about what next step you were planning here.  Are you 
thinking to block this sort of push-down in an update to your feature 
patch, or does some more serious work on foreign table collation need to 
happen first instead?

It looks like there has been some good discussion of this feature here, 
but there is still some work needed before it will be ready to commit.  
Hanada-san, did you get the feedback you were looking for here yet, or 
are there things you still wanted to discuss?  It is not clear to me 
what happens next; I would appreciate your comment on that.

-- 
Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    greg@2ndQuadrant.com   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support  www.2ndQuadrant.us



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Why do regression tests now leave "regress_test_role_super" around?
Next
From: Gabriele Bartolini
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support for foreign keys with arrays