Re: binary patch problems - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Bodor Andras
Subject Re: binary patch problems
Date
Msg-id 4E7753F7.9090903@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: binary patch problems  (Bodor Andras <bodri.mh3@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: binary patch problems
Re: binary patch problems
List pgsql-jdbc
  You are right. But then it is a bug in either the code,
or the documentation. It says:

prepareThreshold = int
     Determine the number of PreparedStatement executions required
before switching over to use server side prepared statements.

I think, if zero executions are required, then the driver
should use prepared statement immediately. Both permanently
disabling and immediately enabling is a legitimate need of
the users, it should be clearly documented, how to do them.
  Anyway, setting prepareThreshold = -1 will do what I meant.
But it is more logical to me, that 0 means zero and -1 means
infinity (even better: Integer.MAX_VALUE).
  For the ForceBinaryTransfers I vote for dropping it, as
it adds unnecessary complications (and new bugs) to the
code.
            Andras

>> Why don't you set prepareThreshold to 0 for your test cases?
>> In this case parameter passing starts immediately for the
>> prepared statement, and ForceBinaryTransfers can be dropped.
>> Andras
>>
 >AbstractJdbc2Statement:
 >    public boolean isUseServerPrepare() {
 >        return (preparedQuery != null && m_prepareThreshold != 0 &&
 >m_useCount + 1 >= m_prepareThreshold);
 >    }
 >
 >If I read the above correctly then prepareThreshold of 0 disables
 >prepared statements.
 >
 >-Mikko

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: binary patch problems
Next
From: Guillaume
Date:
Subject: jdbc and automagic casting