Hackers,
>> B. 6. Current behaviour _is intended_ (there is "if" to check node type) and _"natural"_. In this particular case
userask for text content of some node, and this content is actually "<".
>
> I don't buy that. The check for the node type is there because
> two different libxml functions are used to convert nodes to
> strings. The if has absolutely *zero* to do with escaping, expect
> for that missing escape_xml() call in the "else" case.
>
> Secondly, there is little point in having an type XML if we
> don't actually ensure that values of that type can only contain
> well-formed XML.
Can anyone else weigh in on this? Peter?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
