On Jul 10, 2011, at 1:40 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> Hackers,
>
>>> B. 6. Current behaviour _is intended_ (there is "if" to check node type) and _"natural"_. In this particular case
userask for text content of some node, and this content is actually "<".
>>
>> I don't buy that. The check for the node type is there because
>> two different libxml functions are used to convert nodes to
>> strings. The if has absolutely *zero* to do with escaping, expect
>> for that missing escape_xml() call in the "else" case.
>>
>> Secondly, there is little point in having an type XML if we
>> don't actually ensure that values of that type can only contain
>> well-formed XML.
>
> Can anyone else weigh in on this? Peter?
Unless I am missing something, Florian is clearly correct here.
...Robert
