On sön, 2011-07-10 at 11:40 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Hackers,
>
> >> B. 6. Current behaviour _is intended_ (there is "if" to check node type) and _"natural"_. In this particular case
userask for text content of some node, and this content is actually "<".
> >
> > I don't buy that. The check for the node type is there because
> > two different libxml functions are used to convert nodes to
> > strings. The if has absolutely *zero* to do with escaping, expect
> > for that missing escape_xml() call in the "else" case.
> >
> > Secondly, there is little point in having an type XML if we
> > don't actually ensure that values of that type can only contain
> > well-formed XML.
>
> Can anyone else weigh in on this? Peter?
Looks like a good change to me.
