On 05/27/2011 07:55 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> "Joshua D. Drake"<jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
>>> You have done what you need to do to check the status. Someone who knows
>>> something about the bug should speak up at some point.
>>
>> That patch is waiting for a committer who knows something about Windows
>> to pick it up.
>
> It might be useful, in this situation, for the OP to add this patch to
> the CommitFest application.
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/open
>
> Also, I think it's about time we got ourselves some kind of bug
> tracker. I have no idea how to make that work without breaking
> workflow that works now, but a quick survey of my pgsql-bugs email
> suggests that this is far from the only thing slipping through the
> cracks.
well as for just keeping track of -bugs I guess a very simple schema
would go pretty far:
* have some tool monitor the list and if it sees a new bug# make it a
ticket/bugreport
* if that bug number is mentioned in a commit close it
* provide a dashboard of: a) bugs that never got a response b) bugs that got a response but never have been mentioned
ina commit c) bugs that got mentioned in a commit but no stable release was done yet
* provide a trivial interface (either mail or simple web interface -
maybe in CF style) to make issues as "not a bug" or "not postgresql-core
product" (which seems to be the top two non-big related inquiries we get
on -bugs)
this is more or less exactly what I hacked up back in early 2008 based
on bugzilla (without actually exposing the BZ User-Interface at all -
just using it as a tracker core and talking to it using the API it
provides).
Independent of whether we want to do a full tracker or not anywhere in
the future we could at least start by prototyping with better automatic
monitoring of -bugs.
Stefan
