On Sun, 06 Feb 2011 23:06:21 +0100, Brar Piening <brar@gmx.de> wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 21:26:22 +0100, Magnus Hagander
> <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> it's not something we should hold up the CF / release for.
>
> I agree.
> At least it should get some more testing besides mine.
>
[...]
> Being somewhat short of time in the next weeks I'm at least willing to
> rebase the patch on request and do some more testing or fix issues
> someone else has detected before the next release (9.2?) goes beta.
After some months of being able to regularly compile current head using
Visual Studio 2010 compilers and some more tests I no longer see any
reason why this patch would change without external feedback.
I've tested the latest version (http://www.piening.info/VS2010v6.patch)
with the following config.pl for x86
$config->{perl} = 'C:\Perl'; # ActivePerl 5.8.9 Build 829
$config->{tcl} = 'C:\Tcl'; # ActiveState ActiveTcl 8.4.19.5
$config->{python} = 'C:\Python27'; # Python 2.7.1
$config->{openssl} = 'C:\openssl'; # openssl-1.0.0d
$config->{nls} = 'C:\Dev\gnuwin32'; # GetText 0.14.4
$config->{krb5} = 'C:\Dev\kfw-3-2-2-final';
$config->{xml} = 'C:\Dev\libxml2-2.7.7.win32';
$config->{xslt} = 'C:\Dev\libxslt-1.1.26.win32';
$config->{iconv} = 'C:\Dev\iconv-1.9.2.win32';
$config->{zlib} = 'C:\Dev\zlib125';
for x64 I've tested a less extensive configuration as it's still hard to
get the above libraries as x64 binaries.
I'd appreciate any reviews, tests or comments.
If someone with some more C skills than me could silence the warnings
this would be a huge gain for build speed and testing. My previous
attempts silenced the warnings but built a non-connectable backend.
Regards,
Brar
