Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Date
Msg-id 4DC2F3A5.6050704@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
List pgsql-advocacy
Simon,

> I doubt that anyone wants the current behaviour.
>
> It's a very common thing for minor changes during beta to improve software.
> I think we should be listening to users so that we round off the
> features being delivered with a few tweaks.

Actually, I find the Unlogged tables very useful as they are.  I have at
least 20 clients who store their "session" tables in PostgreSQL, as well
as quite a few clients who use PostgreSQL as a backing store for a queue
with ephemeral data.  And the Unlogged tables are terrrific for doing ELT.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory