Re: branching for 9.2devel - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: branching for 9.2devel
Date
Msg-id 4DC18B20.7060006@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: branching for 9.2devel  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: branching for 9.2devel  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Re: branching for 9.2devel  (David Blewett <david@dawninglight.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
>> You can't indent patches, only patched files. And that's the problem 
>> with this happy scheme. For it to work at all sanely we'd need to keep 
>> the committed code that the patch is to be applied against strictly 
>> pgindent clean, presumably via some automated process such as a commit 
>> hook. That's been suggested in the past, but hasn't met with universal 
>> approval, IIRC.

Well, there is another solution to this, which is to use Git branches
and forks instead of mailing around patches.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: VARIANT / ANYTYPE datatype
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: branching for 9.2devel