Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
Date
Msg-id 4CFD67C7.1020703@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
List pgsql-hackers
> However, if you were doing something like parallel pg_dump you could
> just run the parent and child instances all against the slave, so the
> pg_dump scenario doesn't seem to offer much of a supporting use-case for
> worrying about this.  When would you really need to be able to do it?

If you had several standbys, you could distribute the work of the
pg_dump among them.  This would be a huge speedup for a large database,
potentially, thanks to parallelization of I/O and network.  Imagine
doing a pg_dump of a 300GB database in 10min.

--                                  -- Josh Berkus                                    PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                        http://www.pgexperts.com
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: serializable read only deferrable
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: We really ought to do something about O_DIRECT and data=journalled on ext4