Re: serializable read only deferrable - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: serializable read only deferrable
Date
Msg-id 4CFD0D650200002500038385@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: serializable read only deferrable  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On 06.12.2010 22:53, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> What would be the correct way for a process to put itself to
>> sleep, and for another process to later wake it up?
> 
> See ProcWaitSignal/ProcSendSignal. Or the new 'latch' code.
Is there a reason to prefer one over the other?
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: serializable read only deferrable
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump