Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Now that I look at your new patch, I noticed that I was actually
> confusing relcache.h with rel.h. The latter includes a big chunk
> of our headers, but relcache.h is pretty thin. Including
> relcache.h in another header is not much of a problem.
OK, thanks for the clarification.
With the structures all brought back together in a logical order,
and the new comments in front of the structure declarations, do you
think a summary at the top of the file is still needed in that
header file?
-Kevin
