Excerpts from Kevin Grittner's message of mié sep 15 14:52:36 -0400 2010:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>
> > I think that would also solve a concern that I had, which is that
> > we were starting to include relcache.h (and perhaps other headers
> > as well, but that's the one that triggered it for me) a bit too
> > liberally, so +1 from me.
>
> Unfortunately, what I proposed doesn't solve that for relcache.h,
> although it does eliminate lock.h from almost everywhere and htup.h
> from everywhere.
Now that I look at your new patch, I noticed that I was actually
confusing relcache.h with rel.h. The latter includes a big chunk of our
headers, but relcache.h is pretty thin. Including relcache.h in another
header is not much of a problem.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
