Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Date
Msg-id 4B635110.5060308@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
List pgsql-hackers
> I stand by the position that it's way too late in the cycle for
> insufficiently-thought-out proposals for major behavioral changes.

I don't see how announcing this earlier in the dev cycle would help, at
all.  The people who read -hackers have been using
standards-conforming-strings for years.  Further, if we announce it now,
people have 4-5 months to get ready for it, assuming they were updating
to 9.0.0 anyway, which I doubt anyone is.

For this release, I'm already planning to have  big "backwards
compatibility" section and web page with *lots* of warnings and
explanations, and because of the media around the release for once it
will be read.

I'd argue that Bruce is right; if we're not going to do it now, we might
as well stop pretending we ever are.

--Josh Berkus


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alex Hunsaker
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings