Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alex Hunsaker
Subject Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Date
Msg-id 34d269d41001291316q2bd1d5fdsff89577aa511be28@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 14:03, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 13:42, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I stand by the position that it's way too late in the cycle for
> insufficiently-thought-out proposals for major behavioral changes.

After skimming the thread Bruce linked:http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-04/msg00512.php

It certainly seems "insufficiently-thought-out".  :(


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings