Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: transaction_isolation vs. default_transaction_isolation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: transaction_isolation vs. default_transaction_isolation
Date
Msg-id 4AD4BE88.5070807@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: transaction_isolation vs. default_transaction_isolation  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: transaction_isolation vs. default_transaction_isolation
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
> Yeah, they basically have semantics specified by the SQL standard that
> are not compatible with anything else in GUC land.  They are more like
> SET LOCAL settings, but again not quite.

Mind you, transaction_isolation and transaction_read_only aren't
documented anywhere in our docs *as settings*, even though they show up
in pg_settings.

Doc patch coming ...

--Josh Berkus

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Client application name
Next
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: Wire protocol docs