Re: transaction_isolation vs. default_transaction_isolation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: transaction_isolation vs. default_transaction_isolation
Date
Msg-id 201002221808.o1MI8nS10098@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: transaction_isolation vs. default_transaction_isolation  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus wrote:
> 
> > Yeah, they basically have semantics specified by the SQL standard that
> > are not compatible with anything else in GUC land.  They are more like
> > SET LOCAL settings, but again not quite.
> 
> Mind you, transaction_isolation and transaction_read_only aren't
> documented anywhere in our docs *as settings*, even though they show up
> in pg_settings.
> 
> Doc patch coming ...

What are we doing with this?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.comPG East:  http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do + If your life is a hard
drive,Christ can be your backup. +
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: What does this configure warning mean?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Wire protocol docs