Re: "Hot standby"? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: "Hot standby"?
Date
Msg-id 4A81A597.1000806@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "Hot standby"?  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Responses Re: "Hot standby"?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter,

I believe we're just copying Oracle's terminology.  While that
terminology is not consistent, it is understood by the industry.  Oracle
defined their Hot Standby to have both asynchronous and synchronous modes:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/rdb/htdocs/dbms/hotstandby.html

The other industry term which would be understood would be "log-based
replication".   Terms we invent would be less likely to be understood,
and users would not get excited about them.

Otherwise, I say we go with "simmering follower".  ;-)

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
www.pgexperts.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: pgindent timing (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor NUM_cache_remove calls in error report path to a PG_TRY)
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: machine-readable explain output v4