Re: Review: Revise parallel pg_restore's scheduling heuristic - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: Review: Revise parallel pg_restore's scheduling heuristic
Date
Msg-id 4A7C0457020000250002965F@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Review: Revise parallel pg_restore's scheduling heuristic  (Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk>)
Responses Re: Review: Revise parallel pg_restore's scheduling heuristic  (Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk> wrote: 
> Yes, all that sounds as though you've got it.
Thanks.  I read through it carefully a few times, but I was still only
80% confident that I had it more-or-less right.  ;-)
That does seem like a good test, with the advantage of being
relatively easy to calculate.  Thanks again for suggesting it.
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Alpha releases: How to tag
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixing geometic calculation