Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions
Date
Msg-id 4A1E5FF9.EE98.0025.1@wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: 
> Could someone describe concisely what behavior "snapshot" isolation
> provides that repeatable read does?
Phantom reads are not possible in snapshot isolation.  They are
allowed to occur (though not required to occur) in repeatable read.
Note that in early versions of the SQL standard, this difference was
sufficient to qualify as serializable; but recent versions raised
the bar for serializable transactions.
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions