Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions
Date
Msg-id 200905281529.47952.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thursday 28 May 2009 03:38:49 Tom Lane wrote:
> * SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL something-else should provide our
> current snapshot-driven behavior.  I don't have a strong feeling about
> whether "something-else" should be spelled REPEATABLE READ or SNAPSHOT,
> but lean slightly to the latter.

Could someone describe concisely what behavior "snapshot" isolation provides 
that repeatable read does?


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: search_path vs extensions
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions