Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking
Date
Msg-id 4A1D491B.EE98.0025.1@wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> wrote: 
> Do we need table-level predicate locks at all? What would they give
> us?  Why not just go straight for fine-grained page-level locks?
I don't want to get too far into implementation discussions at this
phase (see Tom's slides ;-)), but suffice it to say that a table scan
can cover more pages than we'd want to track individually....
The coursest possible resolution allows proof of concept.  Tests can
be written that work at that level which should not break as
finer-grained locks are implemented.  (See how I'm drawing from
another presentation? ;-))
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Caleb Welton
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] plpythonu datatype conversion improvements
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Compiler warning cleanup