Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking
Date
Msg-id 1243450824.24860.352.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Responses Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 13:34 -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:

> For the record, it became clear that I did a bad job of communicating
> on this thread...

You did good work, IMHO. Not everything will reach consensus and that's
not your fault.

> first implement table level predicate
> locks, since that has to exist and would provide a complete, if
> somewhat clumsy, serializable solution; then move on to more
> fine-grained locks.  It would probably be workable, and possibly
> optimal, to have just table and page locks; although it seems likely
> that index range locks and row locks would also be worth it,
> eventually.

Do we need table-level predicate locks at all? What would they give us?
Why not just go straight for fine-grained page-level locks?

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking
Next
From: Caleb Welton
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] plpythonu datatype conversion improvements