David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 09:59:14AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com> writes:
>>
>>> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>>>
>>>> The rearrangement might be marginally nicer from a code
>>>> beautification point of view --- right now we're a bit
>>>> inconsistent about whether datatype-specific hash functions live
>>>> in hashfunc.c or in the datatype's utils/adt/ file. But I'm not
>>>> sure that removing hashfunc.c altogether is an appropriate
>>>> solution to that, not least because of the loss of CVS history
>>>> for the functions. I'd be inclined to leave the core hash_any()
>>>> code where it is, if not all of these functions altogether.
>>>>
>>> I guess someone has to talk about it: git will follow the code
>>> even when the file hosting it changes.
>>>
>> That might possibly be relevant a year from now; it is 100%
>> irrelevant to a change being proposed for 8.4.
>>
>
> It's pretty relevant as far as the schedule goes. I'm not alone
> thinking that the appropriate place to make this change, given
> buildfarm support, is at the transition to 8.5.
>
> CVS is dead. Long live git! :)
>
>
That still misses Tom's point, since the change is proposed for 8.4 and
at the earliest we would not change SCCMs until after 8.4 is released
(and, notwithstanding your eagerness, I suspect it will be rather later).
cheers
andrew
