On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 09:59:14AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com> writes:
> > Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> >> The rearrangement might be marginally nicer from a code
> >> beautification point of view --- right now we're a bit
> >> inconsistent about whether datatype-specific hash functions live
> >> in hashfunc.c or in the datatype's utils/adt/ file. But I'm not
> >> sure that removing hashfunc.c altogether is an appropriate
> >> solution to that, not least because of the loss of CVS history
> >> for the functions. I'd be inclined to leave the core hash_any()
> >> code where it is, if not all of these functions altogether.
>
> > I guess someone has to talk about it: git will follow the code
> > even when the file hosting it changes.
>
> That might possibly be relevant a year from now; it is 100%
> irrelevant to a change being proposed for 8.4.
It's pretty relevant as far as the schedule goes. I'm not alone
thinking that the appropriate place to make this change, given
buildfarm support, is at the transition to 8.5.
CVS is dead. Long live git! :)
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
