Hi Tom,
I've been testing this from some time and this appears to resolve the issue=
. Thanks for the quick fix!
Best regards,
Spencer
> On Sep 3, 2016, at 8:49 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>=20
> I wrote:
>> I've now traced it to this bit in gindatapage.c:
>=20
> The attached patch (against 9.4) should be sufficient to fix this problem=
.
> Perhaps you can do some testing there while I'm doing the same.
>=20
> regards, tom lane
>=20
> diff --git a/src/backend/access/gin/gindatapage.c b/src/backend/access/gi=
n/gindatapage.c
> index 2090209..77725ac 100644
> --- a/src/backend/access/gin/gindatapage.c
> +++ b/src/backend/access/gin/gindatapage.c
> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ typedef struct
> char action;
>=20
> ItemPointerData *modifieditems;
> - int nmodifieditems;
> + uint16 nmodifieditems;
>=20
> /*
> * The following fields represent the items in this segment. If 'items' =
is
