Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d
Date
Msg-id 49B575B9.3010804@hagander.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> 
> 
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
>>  
>>> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:    
>>>> but maybe it's better to use -i and -I, and thus change them both?
>>>>       
>>  
>>  
>>> That's already used:
>>>     
>>  
>>  
>>>   -i, --ignore-version     proceed even when server version mismatches
>>>                            pg_dump version
>>>     
>>
>> Proposal: drop the short forms of these two switches entirely.
>> Anybody who actually needs the capability can write "--inserts".
>>
>>            
>>   
> 
> +1. I was just thinking the same thing.

+1, that sounds like a very good idea.

//Magnus



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d
Next
From: Greg Sabino Mullane
Date:
Subject: Re: One less footgun: removing pg_dump -d