Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d
Date
Msg-id 1236673269.31880.341.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 21:02 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
> >>  
> >>> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:    
> >>>> but maybe it's better to use -i and -I, and thus change them both?
> >>>>       
> >>  
> >>  
> >>> That's already used:
> >>  
> >>>   -i, --ignore-version     proceed even when server version mismatches
> >>>                            pg_dump version
> >>
> >> Proposal: drop the short forms of these two switches entirely.
> >> Anybody who actually needs the capability can write "--inserts".
> > 
> > +1. I was just thinking the same thing.
> 
> +1, that sounds like a very good idea.

+1 good plan

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Sampling Profler for Postgres
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Prepping to break every past release...