Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d
Date
Msg-id 26818.1237673792@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
It seemed that the majority opinion in this thread was to eliminate
the confusion by dropping the short form "d" switch in pg_dump and
pg_dumpall --- if you want that behavior you'll have to write
"--inserts".

For consistency I suggested also dropping the short form switch
"D" for "--column-inserts", although this is not absolutely necessary
in terms of eliminating a conflict.

Last chance for objections ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Renner
Date:
Subject: Documentation Update: WAL & Checkpoints
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Can we drop ABSTIME?