Re: Can we drop ABSTIME? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Can we drop ABSTIME?
Date
Msg-id 28515.1237682157@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Can we drop ABSTIME?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> We've been carrying this warning in our docs since 7.4:

> "The key word ABSTIME is ignored for historical reasons: In very old 
> releases of PostgreSQL, invalid values of type abstime were emitted as 
> Invalid Abstime. This is no longer the case however and this key word 
> will likely be dropped in a future release."

> So given that it's been depreciated for 5 versions, maybe it's time to 
> rip it out?

Actually, the change in abstime's output function seems to have been
made in nabstime.c 1.14, committed Mar 14 1997 (pre-6.1).  So I agree,
it's highly unlikely that anyone still needs this behavior.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues