Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d
Date
Msg-id 49B57452.2030304@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d
List pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
>   
>> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: 
>>     
>>> but maybe it's better to use -i and -I, and thus change them both?
>>>       
>  
>   
>> That's already used:
>>     
>  
>   
>>   -i, --ignore-version     proceed even when server version mismatches
>>                            pg_dump version
>>     
>
> Proposal: drop the short forms of these two switches entirely.
> Anybody who actually needs the capability can write "--inserts".
>
>             
>   

+1. I was just thinking the same thing.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d