Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d
Date
Msg-id 14273.1236628116@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Responses Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: One less footgun: removing pg_dump -d  (Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@endpoint.com>)
Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: 
>> but maybe it's better to use -i and -I, and thus change them both?
> That's already used:
>   -i, --ignore-version     proceed even when server version mismatches
>                            pg_dump version

Proposal: drop the short forms of these two switches entirely.
Anybody who actually needs the capability can write "--inserts".
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d