Re: One less footgun: removing pg_dump -d - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: One less footgun: removing pg_dump -d
Date
Msg-id 49B575EE.7090805@endpoint.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: One less footgun: removing pg_dump -d  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
>>   -i, --ignore-version     proceed even when server version mismatches
>>                            pg_dump version
>
> Proposal: drop the short forms of these two switches entirely.
> Anybody who actually needs the capability can write "--inserts".

I thought about something like that, but that would break even more existing
scripts than the current patch, no? I'd be all for not using -I though, as that
would not break anything.

Sorry about the "deprecation" name, I withdraw that part

Magnus: Sorry about non-mergeability, I wrote this while offline...

--
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@endpoint.com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: One less footgun: removing pg_dump -d