Re: Pet Peeves? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Pet Peeves?
Date
Msg-id 49830015.8070604@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Pet Peeves?  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Pet Peeves?  (Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman@gmail.com>)
Re: Pet Peeves?  (Reg Me Please <regmeplease@gmail.com>)
Re: Pet Peeves?  (Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>)
List pgsql-general
Gregory Stark wrote:
> So, what do people say? Is Postgres perfect in your world or does it do some
> things which rub you the wrong way?

* No offer of anything-but-CVS on pgfoundry.org

* Lack of REINDEX CONCURRENTLY

* Too many obscure configuration options: memory management, autovacuum
management, freespace map, background writer, WAL.

* Writing robust scripts with psql is difficult and bizarre.

* Default postgresql.conf is too long and verbose.

* Default logging configuration is too minimal.

* Difficult to trace nested things, e.g., nested PL/pgSQL calls,
cascaded foreign key actions.

* No basic health checking: Answering the question, "Is this system
configured reasonably and running smoothly" takes two days of training
and half a day of work.

* Too much accumulated historical garbage that is never cleared out.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Leif B. Kristensen"
Date:
Subject: Re: PGSQL and Javascript
Next
From: "Daniel Verite"
Date:
Subject: Re: Pet Peeves?