I understood objections for "enable/disable something on compile-time"
approach. The following items are my revised proposal.
It does not conflicts to the policy Peter said before in this thread.
Items to be revised:
- It allows to compile multiple security mechanis within a single binary.
- It provides "--enable-selinux" configure option to build SELinux support, but the Row-level ACLs is always built
becauseit does not require any platform specific libraries and so on.
- User choose one (or no) security mechanism on initdb and postmaster starting up via $PGDATA/postgresql.conf. The
currentavailable options are selinux, rowacl and nothing. (*) What should be the default? rowacl? or, nothing?
The modified initdb interface is as follows: $ initdb --pgace-security=(selinux|rowacl|nothing)
- It add a new system column for security purpose. It enables to store a security attribute of tuple, so working
securitymechanism has to handle it properly. For example, SE-PostgreSQL handles a tuple without valid security
contextas a "unlabeled_t" tuple.
- The security mechanism can control whether the new tuple has its security field, or not. If no security field is
necessary,t_infomask is not set HEAP_HASSECURITY bit, and it does not consume any additional storage space.
Thanks,
--
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
