Hi,
Does this mean we need to wrap new tarballs soon, because of the data loss
bug?
Regards,
Devrim
14 Eylül 2012, Cuma, 4:42 pm tarihinde, Robert Haas yazmış:
> Properly set relpersistence for fake relcache entries.
>
> This can result in buffers failing to be properly flushed at
> checkpoint time, leading to data loss.
>
> Report, diagnosis, and patch by Jeff Davis.
>
> Branch
> ------
> REL9_1_STABLE
>
> Details
> -------
> http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/fef2c17807e095a04441e4f1fe05f75d5578ead2
>
> Modified Files
> --------------
> src/backend/access/transam/xlogutils.c | 5 +++++
> src/backend/storage/buffer/bufmgr.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
>
--
Temporarily using a webmail program.
