Re: contrib translations - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: contrib translations
Date
Msg-id 20120914141339.GA11280@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: contrib translations  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: contrib translations
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:59:45AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie sep 14 10:37:18 -0300 2012:
> > Someone asked me about translations for pg_upgrade, and I don't see 'po'
> > directories for any of the contrib tools.  Do we not translate contrib
> > stuff?  Why?
> 
> We don't.  I don't know the exact reason, but I know that while perusing
> pg_upgrade's source recently I found several things that will need to be
> changed there in order for it to be decently translatable.  Some _()
> were in the wrong places, there are several cases of sentences being
> constructed from parts, and so on.
> 
> If we were to move it to src/bin/ then we would have to talk about
> translatability.  Prior to that I would think it's premature.  I mean,
> if we don't consider it good enough to be in src/bin/, why waste
> translator time on it?

This was a more general question of why contrib doesn't get _any_
translations.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Minor inheritance/check bug: Inconsistent behavior
Next
From: "Devrim GUNDUZ"
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Properly set relpersistence for fake relcache entries.